Study on Social Entrepreneurship Dynamics with special reference to Mumbai, Pune, and Nashik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17697/ibmrd/2024/v13i2/174002Keywords:
Social entrepreneurship, Urban India, Mumbai, Pune, Nashik, Youth engagement, Innovative models, Hybrid organizationsAbstract
Social entrepreneurship has emerged as a transformative force in tackling societal issues while driving economic growth and environmental sustainability. This study delves into the realm of social entrepreneurship in urban India, specifically focusing on Mumbai, Pune, and Nashik. Employing a mixed-methods approach comprising qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys, the research investigates prevalent trends, challenges, and opportunities within the sector, particularly emphasizing youth involvement and innovative models. Through qualitative analysis, the study uncovers significant hurdles faced by social entrepreneurs in securing funding and navigating regulatory complexities. Despite these obstacles, there is a discernible interest in novel approaches like hybrid organizations and impact investing, signalling a shift towards more sustainable and scalable methods of effecting social change. Furthermore, the importance of engaging youth emerges as a pivotal aspect, with their values strongly aligning with the missions of social entrepreneurial ventures. Quantitative analysis substantiates the role of mentorship programs and networking platforms in fostering youth participation in social entrepreneurship. Drawing from these insights, the paper offers practical recommendations for policymakers, organizations, and stakeholders to bolster the growth and resilience of social entrepreneurship endeavors, particularly those involving young individuals. In essence, this research enriches our comprehension of social entrepreneurship dynamics in urban India and furnishes actionable insights to guide strategic decision-making and policy development. By addressing identified challenges, leveraging innovative models, and encouraging youth involvement, stakeholders can collaboratively maximize the impact of social entrepreneurship for driving positive societal change not only in Mumbai, Pune, and Nashik but also across broader contexts.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Austin, J. (2019). Global Perspectives on Social Entrepreneurship: Successful Models and Best Practices. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bornstein, D. (2017). Profiles in Social Entrepreneurship: Inspiring Stories of Change. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Dacin, P. (2016). Cultural Influences on Social Entrepreneurship: Motivations and Behaviors Across Different Contexts. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 123-145.
Desai, M. (2019). Support Structures for Social Entrepreneurs in India: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Social Innovation, 15(3), 267-283.
Gupta, R. (2017). Challenges Faced by Social Entrepreneurs in Mumbai, Pune, and Nashik: A Qualitative Analysis. Social Enterprise Journal, 13(1), 45-63.
Mair, J. (2018). Hybrid Organizations in Social Entrepreneurship: Characteristics and Challenges. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 26(4), 78-92.
Nayar, K. (2020). Social Entrepreneurship in Urban India: Trends and Innovations in Mumbai and Pune. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 18(2), 189-205.
Nicholls, A. (2020). Trends in Impact Investing: Insights from Global Practices. Harvard Business Review, 98(5), 76-89.
Rai, A. (2018). Youth Perspectives on Social Entrepreneurship in India: Motivations and Experiences. International Journal of Youth Studies, 22(3), 301-318.
Sharma, V. (2021). Government Policies for Promoting Social Entrepreneurship in India: Initiatives and Impact. Public Administration Review, 39(4), 567-583.