Examining the Impact of Employee Side-Hustles on Organizational Commitment: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17697/ibmrd/2026/v15i1/174510Keywords:
Side-hustles, Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, Work-Life Balance, Employee Behavior, Gig Economy.Abstract
The growing prevalence of employee side-hustles has transformed the traditional employer-employee relationship, raising important questions about organizational commitment and workplace attitudes. This study examines the impact of employee side-hustles on organizational commitment, with particular focus on the mediating role of job satisfaction. While side-hustles may enhance financial security, skill development, and personal fulfillment, they may also create role conflict, fatigue, and divided loyalty, potentially influencing employees'psychological attachment to their primary organization. The findings indicate that side-hustles have a significant indirect effect on organizational commitment through job satisfaction. Employees who perceive their side-hustles as skill-enhancing and personally meaningful report higher job satisfaction, which in turn strengthens their commitment to the organization. Conversely, when side-hustles generate work-life imbalance or stress, job satisfaction declines, leading to reduced organizational commitment. The study contributes to emerging literature on gig economy participation and employee behavior by highlighting the nuanced role of job satisfaction as a mediating mechanism. Practical implications suggest that organizations should adopt flexible policies and supportive work environments to accommodate employees’ entrepreneurial aspirations while sustaining commitment and performance. The findings provide valuable insights for HR managers, policymakers, and organizational leaders navigating the evolving dynamics of modern employment.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1 (1), 61-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
• Judge, T. A , & Klinger, R. (2008). Job satisfaction: Subjective well-being at work. The Science of Subjective Well-Being, 393-413.
• Campbell, J., & Price, R. (2016). The gig economy and its impact on employee behavior. Journal of Employment Studies, 12(3), 45-60.
• Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons.
• Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
• Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.Org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
• Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The recovery experience questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 204-221. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204