Synergizing Public Facilitation and Private Capital: A Framework for Strengthening Entrepreneurship Development in India

Authors

  •   Shweta Jain Associate Professor, DES' Institute of Management Development & Research
  •   Vrushali Toraskar PGDM student, DES' Institute of Management Development & Research

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17697/ibmrd/2026/v15i1/174520

Keywords:

Development Finance, Enterprise Documentation, Entrepreneurship Ecosystem, Institutional Support Systems, Innovation and Scale, Policy Integration, Public-Private Collaboration

Abstract

India's entrepreneurial landscape consists of two major support streams. Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) depend primarily on public sector institutions for compliance guidance, documentation support, and access to credit scliemes; while innovation-drivenstart-upsrely on private intermediaries for mentoring, incubation, and investment. Although these systems individually strengthen India 'senterprisebase,their limited interaction restricts enterprise progression and limits opportunities for scale. This study examines the functioning of both support systems, analyses challenges encountered by entrepreneurs, and proposes the Public-Private Entrepreneurship Development Framework (PPEDF) as an integrated model to enhance enterprise continuity . Drawing from qualitative insights andexisting literature, the paper finds that entrepreneurs face documentation complexity, capability gaps, uneven awareness of incentives, and variedregulatoryinterpretations. Public-private integration models such as lN-SPACe, the Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC), the Digital Public Infrastruc tureeco system, and Atai innovation Mlssion collaborations demonstrate pathways for coordinated action. The PPEDF identifies four connected stages through which public and private institutions work together to support enterprises at every phase of their growth. The paper ends by recommending practical steps such as creating common documentation systems, jointly delivered training programmes, clear pathways for enterprise growth, and integrated institutional platforms. These measures can help build a more connected, efficient, and supportive entrepreneurial ecosystem in India.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Jain, S., & Toraskar, V. (2026). Synergizing Public Facilitation and Private Capital: A Framework for Strengthening Entrepreneurship Development in India. IBMRD’s Journal of Management & Research, 15(1), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.17697/ibmrd/2026/v15i1/174520

Issue

Section

Articles

References

. Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises.(2024). Annual Report 2023-24. Government of India.

. Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade. (2023). Startup India action plan and progress report. Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.

. Atal Innovation Mission.(2023). Annual report 2022-23. NITI Aayog, Government of India.

. Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council.(2022). Annual report 2021-22. Government of India.

. Ministry of Commerceand lndustry.(2023). Production linke dincentive (PLI) scheme: Guidelines and impact assessment. Governmentof India.

. Ministry of Finance. (2024). Economic survey 2023-24.

. Governmentof India. OECD.(2022). Entrepreneurship ecosystems: Public-private cooperation models. OECD Publisiiing.

. Anderson, L., & Wiiite, R. (2021). Start-up readiness and behavioural chaliengesof early-stage founders. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 14(2), 67-82.

. Arora, S., & Kaur, R.(2021). Venture capital dynamics in emerging markets. Indian Journal of Management Studies, 11(1), 34-49.

. Brown, T., & Davis, M.(2020). Evaluating early-stage ventures: Financial modelling and investor expectations. International Review of Finance and Economics, 8(3), 101-118.

. Chattopadhyay, S. (2020). Barriers to MSME development in India: A field-based assessment. Small Enterprise Review, 15(4), 56-72.

. Das, P.(2021). Public and private institutions in MSME development: Understanding complementary roles. Journal of Development Policy and Practice, 6(2), 95-112.

. Joshi, A. (2022). Strengthening local value chains through the One District One Product initiative. Rural Economy and Markets Journal, 9(1), 22-38.

. Mehta, S. (2022). The role of financial intermediaries in shaping start-up growth trajectories. Journal of Business Strategy and Analysis, 19(1), 14-27.

. Nair, V., & Pandita, R. (2019). Entrepreneurship Development Programs and micro-enterprise success. Indian Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 7(3),41-58.

. Pandey, N. (2021). Institutional facilitation and grassroots entrepreneurship. Economic and Political Weekly, 56(12), 47-53.

. Scott, W.R.(2014).lnstitutions and Organizations: Ideas, lnterests and Identities (4thed.). Sage Publications.

. Singh, R., & Sharma, V.(2020). District-level entrepreneurship support systems and MSME promotion in India. Journal of Small Business Development, 9(2), 14-27.

. Goldar,B., Majumder, P., & Dutta, S.(2023). Investigating the Prevalence of Missing Middle in Indian Manufacturing DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4450086

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.